Lockton Joins GoHealthInsurance’s Workplace Program

Lockton Benefit Group recently joined the GoHealthInsurance Workplace program to provide consumers across the nation with a convenient online solution to find a quality health insurance plan. More than 15,000 Lockton clients will now be able to leverage the GoHealthInsurance technology used by more than 20 million consumers to obtain the right health coverage.

With GoHealthInsurance tools, Lockton clients will be able to instantly compare health plans from the largest insurers in the nation including UnitedHealthOne, many Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies, Aetna and more. The GoHealthInsurane platform represents more than 10,000 health plans nationwide. Lockton members can also speak with a licensed agent for professional service and advice as they explore coverage options.

To find out more information you can read the entire article here.

How Will the Healthcare Reform Act benefit New Jersey Residents?

The new Healthcare Reform Act is slowly being enacted across the nation. Plans and activities are going on in every state and articles on health insurance news dot the Internet.

Let’s take a look at how the new reform will help residents of New Jersey:

  • 1.5 million residents who do not currently have insurance and 326,000 residents who have non-group insurance will be able to get affordable insurance through the health insurance exchange.
  • 854,000 residents will be able to qualify for premium tax credits to assist in  purchasing health coverage.
  • 1.3 million seniors will be eligible to receive free preventive services.
  • 227,000 seniors would have their brand-name drug costs in the Medicare Part D “doughnut hole” halved.
  • 107,000 small businesses could be helped by a small business tax credit to make premiums more affordable.

Let’s examine how families of New Jersey will be affected by the proposals implemented in 2010 and 2011:

The 8.7 million residents of New Jersey will benefit as reform is meant to:

  • Ensure consumer protection – Insurance companies will no longer be able to place lifetime limits on the coverage they provide nor arbitrarily drop coverage.
  • Create insurance options for the uninsured – Healthcare Reform will establish a high-risk pool to enable people who cannot get insurance today to find an affordable health plan. New Jersey has not created a high-risk pool as of yet.
  • Ensure free preventive healthcare services – Health insurance reform will ensure that people can access preventive services for free through their health plans.
  • Supports health coverage for early retirees. A reinsurance program would stabilize early retiree coverage and provide premium relief to both the retiree and the worker in a company that provides employee health benefits. 

The entire healthcare reform act will not be implemented until 2014; however, small implementation steps are already having a positive impact on the resident’s of New Jersey.

What Affect will the New Healthcare Reform Act Have on New Jersey Residents?

The new Healthcare Reform Act will mandate insurance for everyone, make it much easier for people who are sick or have a chronic condition to get health insurance, and provide federal subsidies to some. But, wait a minute; doesn’t New Jersey have many of these provisions already in place?

New Jersey has already implemented many of the health insurance changes that will soon be implemented for the rest of the nation. In 1993, New Jersey lawmakers enacted major changes in the way health insurance is sold to small employers and to individuals purchasing their own health insurance.

New Jersey insurers are banned from denying coverage to anyone based on health history and insurers are also required to spend 80 percent of premiums collected on medical expenses. New Jersey currently limits the variation in premiums for the same policy, based on age, gender, and geography.

While the final form of any federal legislation has not been rolled-out, industry experts point to several important changes the new healthcare reform act will make to residents of New Jersey:

  • Insurers will no longer be able to make someone with a preexisting condition wait up to 12 months for their insurance coverage to begin. Health insurance coverage would start at Day One of enrollment.
  • Everyone will be required to buy health insurance or face penalties. Currently, New Jersey has a “soft mandate”, without penalties, for coverage of children and in-state college students.
  • For residents whose incomes are too high to qualify for Medicaid, but too low to afford coverage on their own, federal subsidies will be provided.
  • Lifetime caps or annual limits on coverage will no longer be allowed.

New Jersey has been in the health insurance news headlines for months, but because of insurance laws enacted in 1993, the news appears to be good news for the residents of the state.

The Impact of Health Care Reform on New Jersey’s Small-business Owner

Many small-business owners in New Jersey are still puzzled over how—if at all, the new health care reform will directly affect them. The health care reform legislation is cumbersome and small-business owners are curious and confused.

Under the health care reform act, companies with more than 50 employees must provide affordable coverage or pay a fine of up to $2,000 per employee, excluding the first 30 employees.

Scott Goldstein, spokesman for the state Chamber of Commerce, said it was difficult to predict how this requirement would affect their members. Of the group’s 1600 members, roughly half have more than 50 employees and many of the businesses provide their employees with health care coverage. “It might come down to whether they meet the minimum standards,” he said, which lawmakers have yet to specify.

The New Jersey chapter of the National Federation of Independent Business questions the effectiveness of the health care reform act’s subsidies for small-businesses.

Under the new legislation, a business with less than 10 employees with an average annual wage of under $25,000 would be eligible for tax credits of up to 50 percent of the employer’s contribution. State director Laurie Ehlbeck stated “Few small businesses will actually qualify,” noting the group’s 8,000 New Jersey members pay an annual salary of $27,000.

There is also confusion with how the new health care reform treats part-time employees. Nancy Lurker, CEO of Parsippany-based PDI, Inc., which outsources services to pharmaceutical companies. “It’s very murky,” she said, “If there’s uncertainty, you don’t hire.” About half of PDI’s 120 New Jersey employees are part-timers and extending coverage to them as well as the full-time employees would have a direct effect on the company’s hiring and expansion plans.

On the other hand, John Sarno, president of the Employers Association of New Jersey sees small-business owners as being shortsighted by only looking at the cost. He said the bill represented a win-win situation because companies with fewer than 50 employees who don’t offer health care coverage would not be required to make any changes.

New Jersey’s Critical Nurse Shortage: What Effect will the Healthcare Reform Act Have?

In 2004, California became the first state to mandate minimum nurse staffing levels for various nursing units. The mandates were specifically designed to regulate how many patients a nurse could care for at any one time. As other states start to look at legislation or regulations, they are using California as an example. With the new healthcare reform act in place more people, who have not been seeking medical assistance due to the lack of health insurance, will clearly increase the patient load on nurses.

Currently New Jersey and Pennsylvania do not have legislation regarding the nurse-patient ratio. Nurse researchers, led by Linda Aiken, R.N., Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, compared the outcomes for nurses and quality of care in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and California.

A total of 22,336 nurses in all three states were surveyed and the patient outcome was examined. The patient outcome included 30-day inpatient mortality and failure-to-rescue across hospitals according to whether the nurses cared for fewer or more patients each.

The key findings in the research were:

  • Nurse workloads in New Jersey and Pennsylvania on all types of units were above the California-mandated staffing level.
  • If New Jersey and Pennsylvania matched California nurse staffing ratio, New Jersey hospitals would have a patient death decrease of 13.9 percent and Pennsylvania would have a decrease of 10.6 percent.

The expanded issue for New Jersey is the state has a shortage of nurses. In February 2010, Acting Governor Stephen M. Sweeney signed the Nursing Faulty Load Redemption Program Act into law. The state senate passed the bill unanimously and declared the nursing workforce shortage of “crisis proportions.” Part of the explanation of the nurse shortage is due to a shortage of faculty members at the state’s schools of nursing.

The new law calls for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation New Jersey Nursing Initiative (NJNI) to work with the Higher Education Student Assistance Authority to create incentives for persons to enter nursing programs by providing loan redemption in exchange for full-time employment in the state as a nurse faculty member.

 “In New Jersey, and elsewhere, we are facing a debilitating shortage of nurse faculty, and as a result many of our schools of nursing are being forced to turn away qualified students who want to become nurses,” said Susan Bakewell-Sachs, Ph.D., R.N., P.N.P.-B.C., program director for NJNI and dean of the School of Nursing, Health, and Exercise Science at the College of New Jersey. “With so many nurses at or near retirement, the population aging, the new healthcare reform act, and chronic diseases affecting more people, our state’s health care system will be strained to the breaking point.

The program will address the nurse faculty shortage by providing incentives for individuals to purse masters and doctoral degrees in nursing. Upon graduation, the program will provide loan redemption in exchange for full-time faculty employment for five years at a school of nursing in the state of New Jersey.

The results of lower nurse-to-patient  ratios are clear, but some states are realizing their shortage of nurses and the potential increase in numbers of patients, due to the new healthcare reform laws, could turn catastrophic for their state.

New Jersey Republican Governor Chris Christie’s Budget Cuts: Increasing Prescription Drug Cost for Seniors

New Jersey Republican Governor Chris Christie is making health insurance headline news hourly it seems! The governor is cutting low-income programs and referring to “shared sacrifice” as he tackles the budget crisis New Jersey is experiencing. 

The “shared sacrifice” motto paints a pretty picture of everyone carrying and equal share of the burden, but according to the New Jersey governor, “Not every cut is equal, and not everyone shares the same definition of “shared sacrifice.”

As the budget cuts are rolled-out it is becoming clear that not everyone is making the same shared sacrifice. New Jersey economic situation is dire and ahs been compared to the Great Depression, so it is undeniable that state spending cuts are needed and that every area of state government will be affected. However some cuts are worse than others. The one most effective group will be those living on fixed incomes.

Governor Christie’s plan forces senior citizens to pay more for their prescription drugs. The New Jersey Foundation for Aging estimates the governor’s plan for higher prescription drug deductibles and co-pays would cost the average senior citizen an extra $430 per year. In a world where people live week-to-week, this is an increase of approximately $35 per week.

Other highlighted area’s that focuses on senior citizens include:

  • Implement a new $310 deductible to 105,000 senior and disabled citizens in the Pharmaceutical Assistance to the Aged and Disabled prescription drug program and 23,000 senior citizens enrolled in the Senior Gold prescription drug program. 
  • Double co-payments on brand-name prescription drugs for those senior and disabled citizens.

The Democrats plan would spread the sacrifice to the 16,000 residents who have a taxable income of $1 million. Their plan implements a temporary tax that would help more than 600,000 senior and disabled citizens who struggle to pay for medication. The Democrats feel that their plan spreads the pain and protects the states’ most vulnerable.

New Jersey is a Winner When it Comes to Healthcare Reform

Every day in the health insurance news reports you can find an article on winners and losers, since the health care reform act was signed into law. However, one state, in particular, seems to rise to the top of the winner list. The state is New Jersey!

Statistics provided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services projects the new health care reform act will reduce cost to New Jersey hospitals for treating uninsured patients by $558 million per year. Of course, taxpayers should realize a savings because it is taxpayer dollars that pay the bill for uninsured residents.

Costs associated with treating uninsured patients in New Jersey have been a death sentence for the state’s hospitals. According to the New Jersey Hospitals Association, there have been 25 hospitals close since 1996. The savings to hospitals and the more than 500,000 uninsured New Jersey residents who will now receive health insurance by law, the hospital system should recognize a substantial increase in revenue and the practice of closing acute-care facilities can stop.

The irony of keeping New Jersey hospitals open is that the state is faced with a critical shortage of nurses. Current projections put the nurse deficit at 20,000 and this number is expected to grow as high as 43,000 within the next three years. The additional increase is due to the fact 20 percent of the state’s nurses are expected to retire within that time frame. New Jersey also projects a shortage of 2,800 physicians by 2020.

To combat the shortage of nurses, the state has implemented the Health Workforce Investment Act. This Act is focused on cultivating qualified health care professionals through incentives and grant funding. The hope is the incentives will spur interest in the health care industry so the state will be able to administer and deliver qualified health care services. The nursing shortage is straining the state because what good are hospitals and insured patients if there are not enough nurses and physicians to provide care. The Health Workforce Investment Act could also have a positive direct effect on New Jersey’s high unemployment rate.

With New Jersey hospitals staying open, a decrease in the number of uninsured residents, and the need for nurses, New Jersey may ultimately be the big winner as the Healthcare Reform Act unfolds.

New Jersey Budget Cuts: Immigrants and Poor to Lose Low-Cost Health Insurance

New Jersey’s fiscal year begins on July 1 and Governor Chris Christie has been busy proposing budget cuts. One of his proposed cuts directly affects low-cost health insurance for low-income families and immigrants of the state.

Governor Christie’s total budget for the state is $29.3 billion and he proposes to save $29 million by eliminating resident immigrants from Family Care, which is the state’s low-cost health insurance program. The proposed cut will also save an additional $24.6 million by closing off the program to thousands of working low-income parents who were projected to sign-up this upcoming year.

The monetary savings are very attractive but the proposed budget-cuts will have a direct affect on 12,000 resident immigrants and 39,000 parents will be denied eligibility in the upcoming year. The Family Care program would remain in intact for the 200,000 adults and 148,000 children currently enrolled.

Health and Human Services Commissioner Jen Velez expressed concern with the debt-ridden states ability to fully fund worthwhile programs including Family Care. The Human Services budget of $11 billion currently funds five psychiatric hospitals, seven developmental centers and many other programs and services for low-income and immigrant residents.

The proposed budget cuts totaling about $182 million were made to minimize the impact on services provided. Velez said the state would lose approximately $108 million in federal matching funds if the services provided by the Health and Human Services Department were cut to 15 programs, as proposed.

With limited state resources for low-income families, concerns are Governor Christie’s budget cuts will increase emergency room visits and decrease preventative care for the working poor of New Jersey.

New Jersey Budget Cuts and the Direct Effect on Women’s Health Care

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has been slashing the states budget recently in an attempt to bring New Jersey’s budget crisis under control; however, one proposed budget-cut has been labeled as the “evisceration of women’s rights.”

Governor Christie has proposed cutting all state funding for women’s reproductive health services. According to Deborah Jacobs, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, “This budget cut would undermine basic health care and erode fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the law.”

Christie’s proposal would cut $7.5 million for women’s health services. Currently this funding allows more than 50 New Jersey health centers to offer breast and cervical cancer screening, birth control services, gynecological exams, and prenatal care. In addition, low income families represented the majority of the 140,000 patients treated at family planning centers in 2009. Of these 140,000 patients 70 percent were uninsured or underinsured and used the health care center as their sole health care provider. If the proposed budget cuts pass, there will be an estimated 40,000 patients not receiving care at the centers.

Governor Christie has also withdrawn the states application for a Medicaid waiver that would have allowed these health care centers to expand services using federal dollars. With many of the benefits in the national health care reform not taking affect until 2014, these proposed cuts could leave an already vulnerable New Jersey population, without the medical services they have come to rely on.

Jacobs also notes, “Christie’s cuts will cost the state more in the long run, both for the economy and society. Adding a medical crisis to a budget crisis is no cure” (Jacobs, New Jersey Newsroom, 4/8).

Federal Matching Funds for Electronic Health Record Incentives: New Jersey to Receive Millions

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced in May that New Jersey’s Medicaid program will receive federal matching funds for state planning activities necessary to implement the electronic health record (EHR) incentive program established by the American Recovery Act of 2009 (Recovery Act). This is a key step to further states’ role in developing a U.S. health information technology (HIT) infrastructure.

The Recovery Act provides a 90 percent federal match for state planning activities to administer the incentive payments to Medicaid providers and ensure proper payments through audits. New Jersey will receive approximately $4.93 million in federal matching funds.

New Jersey will use its federal matching funds to gather information on issues such as existing barriers to its use of EHR’s, provider eligibility, and to complete a comprehensive study to determine the current status of HIT activities in the state. Experts from the medical industry, health insurance industry, government, and private enterprise have been pondering the need for a national database. The dilemma is how to overcome technological and regulatory barriers in order to create the medical records database and use EHR’s.

With the new healthcare reform laws, Electronic Medical Records are set to be implemented by 2015. If doctor’s offices are not compliant they will face fines.

Federal grant incentives are in place for physician’s to make the investment now. The investment being software, equipment, consultants, and training; which is going to be costly. Some physician’s are of the mind-set that it won’t matter since they are planning on retiring before the deadline arrives, others are contemplating retiring early to avoid the perceived “hassle of the transition.”

EHR’s are being implemented to improve the quality of heath care for citizens of New Jersey and make their care more efficient by providing medical information electronically to various providers who may be treating the same Medicaid patient.

“We congratulate New Jersey for qualifying for these federal matching funds to assist its plan for implementing the Recovery Act’s EHR incentive program,” said Cindy Mann, director of the Center for Medicaid and State Operations at CMS. “Meaningful and interoperable use of EHR’s in Medicaid will increase health care efficiency, reduce medical errors and improve quality-outcomes and patient satisfaction within and across the states.”